Science
  • The Nature Assessment Approach
  • Natural Capital Indicators
    • Carbon Indicators
      • Indicator: Above ground carbon
      • Indicator: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Soil Indicators
      • Indicator: Soil Carbon Stock
      • Indicator: Soil Carbon Potential
    • Water Indicators
      • Indicator: Soil Moisture
      • Indicator: Water Holding Capacity
      • Indicator: Water Holding Capacity Potential
      • Indicator: Precipitation Trend
    • Biodiversity Indicators
      • Indicator: Protected On-Farm Habitat
      • Indicator: Species Presence
      • Indicator: Landscape Habitat Diversity & Farm-level Contribution
      • Indicator: Ecological Integrity
      • Indicator: Habitat Intactness
      • Indicator: Indicator Species Presence
    • Auxiliary Indicators
      • Indicator: Deforestation (EUDR)
      • Indicator: Climate Risk
      • Indicator: Forest Canopy & Height Cover
      • Indicator: Vegetation Condition
      • Indicator: Land Use and Land Cover
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Natural Capital Indicators
  2. Water Indicators

Indicator: Water Holding Capacity

Indicator

Water Holding Capacity

Description

Maximum amount of water that soil can retain, measured in m³/Plot and m³/ha, with an estimate of uncertainty provided as the average standard deviation of WHC estimates.

Unit

m³ (total and per hectare)

Temporal Resolution

Annual Assessment

Spatial Resolution

100m

Data

Satellite data (SMAP, SMOS, Landsat, MODIS, Sentinel 2); ISRIC SoilGrids v2.

Method

Water holding capacity is estimated based on soil moisture dynamics over time, analyzing the ability of soil to retain water against gravity (also known as field capacity). It is derived from a time-series of soil moisture data and constrained by soil texture information from SoilGrids.

Confidence interval

Confidence intervals for water-holding capacity (WHC) are derived by averaging values within the 10th–15th percentiles for wilting point and the 92nd–95th percentiles for field capacity. This method reduces noise and improves reliability by smoothing out variability and minimizing outlier effects. Additionally, the standard deviation within these ranges serves as a confidence flag—lower values indicate more consistent, reliable estimates, while higher values highlight greater variability. This approach enhances the precision and robustness of soil hydraulic property estimates.

Benchmarking

Benchmarks for water-holding capacity (WHC) are based on predicted soil texture (sand and clay fractions) from the SoilGrids v2 dataset. Using a pedotransfer function (Saxton & Rawls, 2006), WHC is estimated across a range of possible soil organic carbon concentrations. From the resulting distribution, the low benchmark is set at the minimum WHC value, the high benchmark at the maximum, and the middle benchmark at the median WHC value for the soil type predicted on the plot.

PreviousIndicator: Soil MoistureNextIndicator: Water Holding Capacity Potential

Last updated 2 months ago